Lectures |
Table of Contents |
|
This was one of the most important scientific debates of the 20th Century.
Shapley was right that the Sun does not lie at the center of the Milky Way Galaxy but rather many kpc away -- actually about 2/3 of the way from the center of the Milky Way to the "edge", i.e. where the stars appear to end. However, he got a bit carried away with his picture of the Milky Way, which he maintained was a huge system containing everything in the visible Universe. Meanwhile, Heber Curtis maintained that small points of light in some spiral nebulae that suddenly appeared and then faded were actually novae and supernovae -- meaning the nebulae must be millions of light years away.
The issue was settled in 1919 when Edwin Hubble turned the
Mt. Wilson 100-inch telescope on M31, the Andromeda nebula, and discovered
-- Cepheid variable stars! They appeared so faint that M31 had
to be outside the Milky Way. The extragalactic age had dawned. Now
we know that in fact all the spiral "nebulae" are external galaxies
like the Milky Way, and that ours is but one of literally hundreds of
billions of galaxies in the observable Universe. We live on an
ordinary planet orbiting an ordinary star orbiting the center of an
ordinary galaxy in an ordinary part of a very large, very old, and
not very human-centered Universe.
Galaxy formation and evolution is one of the hot research topics of astrophysics today. Any good theory will need to be able to describe all of the characteristics of the Milky Way listed above, as well as several others, including:
Two major theories of galaxy formation are top down and
bottom up. Top-down theories propose that the Milky Way formed
from a huge cloud of gas that collapsed all at once under its own
gravity, similar to the way we now believe the Solar System formed.
Bottom-up or "hierarchical" theories hold that small things formed
first, then collected together into larger things, then larger, and so
on until galaxies like the Milky Way were fully assembled. In 2006,
bottom-up theories appear to be much more successful than top-down
theories at explaining both the broad brush strokes and the
complicated details of galaxies like the Milky Way.
Lectures |
Table of Contents |
|